12 ‘smoking guns’ that jab-skeptics think prove there’s something fishy going on
THE TOP 12 ‘SMOKING GUNS’ THAT, ACCORDING TO CERTAIN JAB-SKEPTICS, PROVE THE COVID AFFAIR IS NOT WHAT IT SEEMS
——————————————————————————————————————————————
IMPORTANT NOTES:
This article is a preliminary version. We intend to augment it weekly.
If any of the links below are broken, please let us know. Thanks.
“The purpose of the data on this website is education. This information is not to be construed as medical or nutritional advice. Please consult with a qualified health professional.”
INTRODUCTION
Some Covid-jab-skeptics reckon that every single one of the following items represents such compelling evidence on its own that something surreptitious is ‘going on’ with Covid and/or the Covid jabs that it actually qualifies as a ‘smoking gun’ – i.e. something that cannot possibly be explained in any way other than as incontrovertible proof that the powers-that-be are ‘up to something’ that the man in the street isn’t being told.
1) Handling of the Southern Border of the USA.
The Biden administration has kept open the southern land border to the USA, allowing millions (literally) of illegal immigrants to enter the USA – and yet the administration has not required these people to be jabbed against Covid. (One possible implication, in the eyes of those jab-skeptics who believe the jabs are designed to kill, is that the Administration wants these immigrants to still be alive to vote Democrat in 2024. After all, LEGAL immigrants ARE required to be jabbed. But regardless, if Covid was truly the threat the Administration has claimed, skeptics are certain their handling of the Southern Border would be very different.)
2) Promoting the BLM and Antifa riots.
When the ‘BLM’ and ‘Antifa’ protests were taking place on the streets of American cities at the very height of the Covid pandemic, the powers-that-be did not crack down on them. Indeed, in many quarters, the powers-that-be stoked, encouraged, and promoted the protests. Yet, according to what the powers-that-be were telling the public about Covid, these people were putting themselves, and much of the rest of America at huge risk. In the USA, members of the public were banned from protesting about the way the authorities were handling Covid, because it was ‘unsafe’ to protest, but the public were ‘magically’ allowed to protest as long as it was in support of the BLM or Antifa movements.
See, for example, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVogHLy-NT0
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/06/05/black-lives-matter-has-killed-the-lockdown/
https://billmuehlenberg.com/2020/06/08/the-end-of-covid-and-the-ongoing-hypocrisy-of-our-leaders/
3) Claiming that the only solution to the pandemic is vaccines.
Leaders have insisted that the only way out of the pandemic is vaccines. But skeptics feel this assumes that no preventatives, AND no treatments, will be found that make such vaccines unnecessary (or else it assumes that such preventatives and treatments MAY be found but that the powers-that-be will be able to successfully suppress the truth about them – such that vaccines ARE required). Skeptics ask how these leaders can possibly know the future on this, unless weird things are going on that the public are not being told. For three examples in a row, where Bill Gates states, “Normalcy only returns when we’ve largely vaccinated the entire global population”; Justin Trudeau declares, “This will be the new normal, until a vaccine is developed”, and Doug Ford proclaims, “Until we find a vaccine, going back to normal means putting lives at risk”, see 50:42 of ‘Plandemic II: Indoctornation’: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ehDcIQaxrrTI/ or https://www.brighteon.com/d6412bff-0421-4190-a7bf-3e5e1f52559d
Boris Johnson did the same when he categorically averred, “the health of every country depends on the whole world having access to a safe and effective vaccine”. See 06:35 of his Sept. 2020 speech to the UN General Assembly: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xW7hnZFV84M&t=149s
See also Ursula von der Leyen saying, “We know we can ONLY defeat the virus with a vaccine” “Corona Film”, 1:09:23ish: https://odysee.com/@FTC-NL:0/FilmCorona–FTC-NL:5
4) Claiming that those who refuse the jabs are simultaneously morons AND selfish.
Within just months of the jab roll-out starting, the powers-that-be were calling those who chose not to take the jab “stupid”, “idiots” and “morons” – on the basis that the jabs are convenient and free and are “safe and effective” and that Covid is “a deadly killer”. Yet, somehow, the powers-that-be also felt justified in complaining that people who refuse the jabs are “selfish” and are refusing to make this “sacrifice”. To jab-skeptics, you can’t have it both ways. You can’t be a “stupid idiot” for not wishing to make a “sacrifice”. Jab-skeptics argue that the clear implication of the combination of these facts is that the purpose of the jabs is not as billed.
5) The rush to jab children – in view of the facts on Covid and the Covid jabs.
For details, see Part 2 of our film “Officially Fishy?”. (So desperate were the powers-that-be to jab young children – despite the absolutely minuscule threat to children from Covid – that they actually encouraged pregnant women to take the jab (even though – since the days of Thalidomide – pregnant women are *never* encouraged to take jabs that are still in their trial phase), so as to encourage parents to feel comfortable letting their little ones receive it.)
6) Hiding ways to boost one’s immune system.
To skeptics, the powers-that-be have systematically hidden the various natural ways a human can boost their immune system so it’s better placed to fight the virus. (We touch on this in Part 2 of our film “Officially Fishy?”. Please also see our article on boosting immunity[Link]
7) Hiding (and even banning) good preventatives and treatments.
When doctors have reported great results for various preventatives and treatments, skeptics feel that the powers-that-be have: dragged their feet to a monstrous degree, lied about the effectiveness of these items, and – when they couldn’t hide the truth any longer – provided totally insufficient doses. While foisting the new jabs on the public – jabs created using technical platforms that have never made it to licensure before, and for which the phase 3 trials were still YEARS from completion – the powers-that-be demanded lengthy, costly, full-blown, double-blind, randomized, Gold-standard trials for the preventatives and treatments that doctors were swearing by – even though the relevant medicines had been around for decades and were known to have superb safety profiles and with no significant problems identified by doctors using them for Covid. (For more details, see our article on Covid preventatives and treatments [Link].) What’s more, when doctors reported great results for various preventatives and treatments, and when circumstances forced the powers-that-be to run trials for those medicines, the powers-that-be sabotaged the clinical trials (i.e. they were organized and run in completely inappropriate ways guaranteed to ensure that the items failed their tests). For details, see https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html (Article: “The 2 Married Pink Elephants in the Historical Room”)
and – “The extraordinary story of how patient access to COVID treatments was denied, eventually involving witch hunts of physicians who dared to treat patients”:
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/the-extraordinary-story-of-how-patient?s=r
See also:
https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/the-hydroxychloroquine-scandal
https://conservativewoman.co.uk/the-lancet-and-the-trashing-of-a-cure-for-covid
https://conservativewoman.co.uk/covid-fighting-drug-is-imperilled-by-politics/
https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/05/the-hydroxychloroquine-meltdown/
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/my-front-row-view-of-the-covid-drug-corruption-scandal/
See also https://twitter.com/i/status/1576380285482065920 (Dana White on IVM and MCA)
8) Ensuring Covid spread more.
In many countries, the powers-that-be took steps, in the early days and weeks after the discovery of Covid-19, to guarantee (in the eyes of jab-skeptics at least) that the virus would spread across the globe (e.g. by ensuring that no checks of any kind were put in place at airports, and by ensuring that no quarantining was required for new arrivals). The powers-that-be made a variety of what skeptics consider epidemiologically-unwise moves that guaranteed Covid would spread to every nation around the world – and to almost every corner of every nation. For some purported examples, focusing on China’s and the W.H.O.’s handling of the outbreak that guaranteed Covid would circle the globe, see: https://order-order.com/2020/05/19/read-full-trumps-letter-world-health-organisation/
9) Ensuring Covid killed more.
The powers-that-be took steps that, to skeptics, inevitably and unnecessarily increased the number of deaths the authorities could attribute to Covid. In the UK, for example, the government placed tens of thousands of elderly hospital patients – untested and potentially with Covid – into care homes that were already occupied. (The UK government reportedly had the option of placing these patients into new, unoccupied, facilities, but chose not to.) The end result was predictable. Huge numbers of care home residents got Covid and died.) For details regarding this – and the same sort of thing in other countries – see https://wikispooks.com/wiki/COVID-19/Euthanasia [Internal Note: see also sg ‘vid 2 223’ re Ireland.]
Also, the UK government’s decision to let care home staff move around different homes was patently laughable to skeptics. Likewise, it was insane to offer hospitals excessive financial incentives to process those patients who were coming in for other reasons in such a way that these patients were bound to catch Covid during their stay. Similarly, the powers-that-be gave excessive incentives to ensure Covid patients were put on ventilators (an extremely dangerous protocol) whether they needed it or not. The powers-that-be also increased the number of Covid hospitalizations and deaths (in the eyes of jab-skeptics) by basically advising members of the public who tested positive for Covid to simply go home and do nothing until they turned blue. They did similarly by promoting the (extremely toxic and extremely ineffective, in the view of skeptics) treatment Remdesivir.
10) Jab mandates, in view of the facts.
Mandating the Covid jabs, especially in the way the powers-that-be did in practice, certainly amounts to a ‘smoking gun’ in the minds of skeptics. For details, see Part 3 of our film “Officially Fishy?” and also this article: [Link].
11) Natural immunity versus jabs.
Time and again the powers-that-be have, according to skeptics, lied about how the breadth, depth and longevity of immunity afforded by having had a Covid-19 infection invariably surpasses any such protection from the jabs. The powers-that-be were vocal in their insistence that, even if you were under 40 years of age and had already had Covid, you should still get a Covid jab – despite the lack of long-term safety data on these new jabs. To skeptics, the way the authorities played down the value of natural immunity (AND played down the fact that the presence of antibodies is far from being the ‘be-all-and-end-all’ when it comes to natural immunity – ‘T-cells’ are the main issue) was against all known science. Take, for example, Reuters’ incredibly weak statement “people who recover from COVID-19 *usually* gain *some* immune defenses against reinfection”. (NOTE: Skeptics realize that some people have tested positive more than once for Covid, but – unless these people were part of the tiny fraction of the population who were severely immunocompromised to begin with, to the point that their immune system was unable to adjust itself to being able to cope with Covid – skeptics feel either (a) they tested positive subsequent to their original infection simply because the PCR test picked up fragments of the dead virus from first time around, or (b) they’d taken the jab and it had damaged their immune system so its ability to fight off further infections was undermined. (It has been shown that the immune systems of people who had been infected by SARS1 still had immunity to it 18 YEARS later.) For more, see:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1509852615751962627 (Fauci’s 2004 remarks about flu shots)
https://principia-scientific.com/new-studies-show-acquired-natural-immunity-outperforms-vaccines
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/vaccine-researcher-weve-made-a-big-mistake/
12) When taken together, all the evidence that the pandemic was PLANNED constitutes a smoking gun.
See our article on this: [Link].